Gaw v. Gaw

Plaintiff was granted a divorce on the ground of extreme and repeated cruelty. Defendant appeals, contending that plaintiff did not establish defendant’s cruelty and that, if he did, he is shown by the record to have been equally guilty of acts charged by Mm against defendant as grounds for divorce.

It appears the defendant was constantly nagging plaintiff, that they had frequent quarrels and arguments, that each repeatedly called the other vile and obscene names and that on 1 or 2 occasions severa? years ago plaintiff struck defendant. The trial court was impressed that, in the respects…