Legal Opinion
State v. Friedman
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 13, 1967No. 51954PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Commissioner.
Defendant was convicted by the verdict of a jury and the judgment of the court of a violation of § 301.400, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., which provides:
“Any person who removes, covers, alters or defaces, or causes to be destroyed, removed, covered, altered or defaced, the manufacturer’s number, the motor number or other distinguishing number on any motor vehicle, or number or other distinguishing number on any motor vehicle tire, the property of another, for any reason, shall be deemed guilty of a felony * *
Defendant attacks the indictment of the grand jury, the sufficiency of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UnkrichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WakefieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968