Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
While the directive's treatment of casinos stands out, other facilities are also given more favorable treatment than houses of worship. Take the example of bowling alleys. Some Las Vegas bowling alleys where tournaments are held can seat hundreds of spectators, and under the directive, these facilities may admit up to 50% of capacity. Not only that, the State tolerates seating arrangements at these facilities that pose far more danger than the plan Calvary Chapel proposes. An official state guidance document states that groups of up to 50 people may sit together in the grandstands of a…
Also in this document: Dissent · Gorsuch; Dissent · Kavanaugh.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Children's Health Defense Inc. v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Commonwealth of Ky. ex rel., Danville Christian Academy Inc. v. Andrew BeshearCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Heights Apartments, LLC v. Tim WalzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Planned Parenthood of Grt TX v. Courtney PhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Lujan Grisham v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.