Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Rightnour

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1976No. 23Published

1DissentRoberts, Justice

I dissent. Because appellant asserts a valid claim for relief which is cognizable under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA),1 the order dismissing appellant’s petition without a hearing should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Appellant was tried in October 1966 and found guilty of murder of the first degree. The judgment of sentence was appealed to this Court and affirmed by an equally divided Court. Commonwealth v. Rightnour, 534 Pa. 104, 253 A.2d 644 (1969).2 In November 1969 appellant petitioned for post-conviction relief. The PCHA court dismissed without a hearing believing that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API