State v. Scott

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Defendant was charged with the crime of grand larceny. She was convicted of petty larceny, and appeals.

Appellant first complains the verdict of the jury was contrary to and not sustained by the evidence. No purpose is to be served in repeating the evidence of the state and of the defendant. It was in conflict and the jury elected to believe the state’s witnesses. Their evidence discloses the defendant committed the crime with which she was charged.

Other specifications of error are that incompetent evidence was admitted, that the instructions…