Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Busse

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Probate Court, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J.:

On the 16th of July, 1867, Albert Busse died intestate, leaving surviving him Jane Busse, his widow, and David E. Busse, his brother. There were no children, and the estate is to be divided between said widow and brother. He owned real estate in San Francisco, hut had not resided on it, nor had any portion of it, during his lifetime, been set apart, or dedicated as a homestead under the statute relating to homesteads. After his déath, on the petition of the said widow, the Probate Court, assuming to act under the provisions of section one hundred twenty-one of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCloy & Trotter v. ArnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Kachigian v. KachigianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Larco v. ClementsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bowman v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hunt v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API