Legal Opinion

State v. Mosbrucker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2008No. 20070355PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeff Mosbrucker appealed from a criminal judgment entered after being found guilty of gross sexual imposition following a jury trial. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In August 2006, Mosbrucker and Jane Doe, who was eighteen years old at the time, had sex outside her parent’s home. Mosbrucker was charged with gross sexual imposition for engaging in a sexual act with Doe, whom the State alleged was forced into the sexual act or had a mental disease or defect rendering her incapable of understanding the nature of the conduct. Mosbrucker’s first trial in March 2007 ended in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. EasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. State v. OlivioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. People v. McMullenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Nevland v. NjustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Board v. AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. KEELEYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
  4. Lenton v. LentonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API