State v. Mosbrucker
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Jeff Mosbrucker appealed from a criminal judgment entered after being found guilty of gross sexual imposition following a jury trial. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In August 2006, Mosbrucker and Jane Doe, who was eighteen years old at the time, had sex outside her parent’s home. Mosbrucker was charged with gross sexual imposition for engaging in a sexual act with Doe, whom the State alleged was forced into the sexual act or had a mental disease or defect rendering her incapable of understanding the nature of the conduct. Mosbrucker’s first trial in March 2007 ended in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. EasleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. OlivioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- People v. McMullenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Nevland v. NjustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Board v. AskewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- KEELEYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- Lenton v. LentonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.