Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nixon v. QuikTrip Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 30, 2004No. SC 85399PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

Does Missouri’s Motor Fuel Marketing Act protect gas stations from competition, which may raise prices to consumers, or does the act only protect these businesses from injurious competition?

The state brought an action against QuikTrip for pricing its retail gasoline sales below its wholesale cost at its Herculaneum store on 23 days, alleging that QuikTrip violated the act. On stipulated facts, the circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the state and assessed penalties of $3,000 per day.

On appeal, QuikTrip challenges the constitutionality of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Wolff Shoe Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Hammerschmidt v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Gott v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. Hemeyer v. KRCG-TVSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Treasurer of the State v. WitteSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. BP Products North America Inc. v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. United Pharmacal Co. of Missouri, Inc. v. Missouri Board of PharmacySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Mantia v. Missouri Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. State Ex Rel. Unnerstall Ex Rel. Leighton v. BerkemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API