State v. Doe
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoeden, J.
— An indictment was found against the appellee in the court below, charging that the defendant, “ on the 12th day of October, 1881, at,” etc., “ did then and there unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and lead away two dogs,, of the value of $50, of the goods and chattels of George Stultz,. contrary,” etc.
On motion of the defendant the indictment was quashed and the State excepted. The State brings the case here for a review of the decision below.
*10It is claimed by the appellee that dogs are not the subject of felonious larceny, and therefore that the indictment was properly quashed. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bright v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Parker v. MiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Mitchell v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Kinsman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Hamby v. SamsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
- Rockwell v. Oakland Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.