Legal Opinion

Nordred Realties, Inc. v. Langley

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 10, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinter, J.

In this proceeding to dispossess the tenant for nonpayment of an increased rent, he defends by reason of the conceded fact that the landlord has violated section 216 of article 7 of the Multiple Dwelling Law during the. period for which the tenant has defaulted in the payment of the rent. The landlord urges that subdivision 3 of section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law (as added by Laws of 1938, chap. 675), the so-called Minkoff Act, on which the tenant relies, is violative of the Constitutions of the State of New York and of the United States in that it takes property without due process of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrell v. DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Dawson v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1961
  3. John M. Horvath, D.C., P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2009
  4. Parmer Realty Corp. v. BercowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API