Erickson v. Rocco
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentSam D. Johnson, Justice
This dissent is respectfully submitted.
At the outset it should be noted that the trial court, in its order restraining Farm and Home from proceeding with its foreclosure, has concluded that such action would not only cause irreparable damage but also would be wrongful. The choice of the word wrongful would appear to be most unfortunate, especially when contained in an order restraining the enforcement of a remedy to which Farm and Home was clearly entitled.
The trial court’s order concluding that foreclosure would be wrongful enumerates three, and only three, grounds: (1) insurance coverage is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Citizens National Bank v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Wamix, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.