Legal Opinion
People v. Williams
California Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1988No. Docket Nos. Crim. 20911, 23904PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
44 Cal.3d 883 (1988)
751 P.2d 395
245 Cal. Rptr. 336
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
KEITH DANIEL WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. In re KEITH DANIEL WILLIAMS on Habeas Corpus.
Docket Nos. Crim. 20911, 23904.
Supreme Court of California.
March 24, 1988.
COUNSEL
Richard B. Mazer, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Edmund D. McMurray, Garrett Beaumont, Jana Tuton and J. Robert Jibson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
EAGLESON, J.
A jury convicted Keith Daniel Williams of three…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016