Legal Opinion

Fish v. Farwell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Memorandum,—Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Francis Adams, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

September 29, 1888, the appellants filed a praecipe and sued out a summons against the appellees, six in number, which was returned served October 3, 1888, on John V. Farwell, Jr., only. December 7, 1888, the appellants filed a declaration in assumpsit, containing only common counts.

October 29, 1891, was this order: “ On motion of attorneys for defendants, it is ordered that the plaintiffs file herein a bill of particulars under the declaration filed by them within twenty days from this date; and it is further ordered, on motion of plaintiffs’ attorney, that leave be, and is hereby given said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Faulk v. KellumsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Cogshall v. BeesleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Cummings v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Jansen v. GrimshawIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. EylenfeldtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. R. Co. v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Smith v. CondonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API