Legal Opinion

Pesek v. City of New Prague

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1906No. Nos. 14,647—(206)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in’ the district court for Scott county to recover $15,000 for personal injuries received by plaintiff’s minor son while in the performance of his duties as an employee of defendant. From an order, Morrison, J., overruling a general demurrer to the complaint, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appeal from ail order overruling a general demurrer to plaintiff’s ■complaint.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence and carelessness of defendant in failing to guard and protect certain machinery operated by it in ■connection with its waterworks and electric light plant system, by reason of which, and without fault on his part, plaintiff’s minor son was seriously injured while engaged in the performance of his duties as a servant of defendant. Two points are made against the sufficiency of the complaint: First, that it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winters v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Kelly v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frasch v. City of New UlmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Williams v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Mitchell v. Village of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Gaughan v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Quackenbush v. Village of SlaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API