Legal Opinion

Saenz v. Pittenger

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1986No. 16-79-09507; CA A35102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This case arose from a sale of real property to plaintiffs. Defendant Blinkhorn Company (Blinkhorn) appeals from a judgment entered against it on a claim for an unlawful trade practice. Plaintiffs discovered that the well on the property did not produce an adequate supply of water for household use, contrary to alleged representations made by defendants. They commenced this action with claims for breach of contract against the sellers, defendants Pittenger, unlawful trade practice against real estate brokers Blinkhorn and Iverson Hughes, Inc., and their agents, and common-law fraud against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Duncan v. AugterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Bodin v. B. & L. FURNITURE CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Oregon Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Pearson v. Philip Morris, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API