Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Chalmette Refining, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2017No. 2016-CA-1117, NO. 2016-CA-1118PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Terrel J. Broussard, Pro Tempore
h Chalmette Refining, L.L.C., and Eaton Corporation appeal the district court’s amended judgment of June 17, 2016, which arose out of a June 15, 2015 bench trial. The trial was held to determine an award of cleaning cost damages in. this class action proceeding.1 For the reasons herein, we reverse the judgment of the district court.
Facts and Procedural History
This niatter arose out of an industrial accident which occurred at Chalmette Refining’s St. Bernard facility. Because of problems with some electrical equipment manufactured by Eaton, the refinery’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kaiser v. HardinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Perez v. State, Through DOTDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bates v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Freeman v. GTS CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Overton v. Shell Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- AR Brooks Paint Contracting LLC v. Steele EunsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- Henry W. Kinney v. the Biodistrict New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Dale Dwayne CraigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2025
- Sue Perry, Et Ux Versus Employers Insurance of WausauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025