Legal Opinion
Anzivino v. Lutz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 15, 1997No. 96-17012Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
132 F.3d 38
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Mark A. ANZIVINO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas W. LUTZ, Charles L. Ryan; Theodore B. Jolley; Troy
Garey; Bradner Lawrence; J. Kewley; Irene Moreno; Terry
L. Rutan; C. Harty; B. Doster; Rhonda Sergeant; Brenda
Johnson; Jeannie M. Brehn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-17012.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Wallis v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.