Commercial Bank of St. Paul v. Azotine Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff recovered judgment in tbe district court for Ramsey county against tbe defendant Azotine Manufacturing Company, execution was returned unsatisfied, and a receiver of tbe company was appointed. Thereupon tbe Anchor Investment Company in its own behalf and in behalf of all other creditors of the Azotine Company, filed a supplemental complaint in intervention to enforce the double liability of the stockholders of the Azotine Company.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff recovered judgment in tbe district court for Ramsey county against tbe defendant Azotine Manufacturing Company, execution was returned unsatisfied, and a receiver of tbe company was appointed. Thereupon tbe Anchor Investment Company in its own behalf and in behalf of all other creditors of the Azotine Company, filed a supplemental complaint in intervention to enforce the double liability of the stockholders of the Azotine Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff and the intervenor, entered pursuant to findings made by Otis, J., James G. Donnelly, one of the defendants,…
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is the second appeal in this case, and is from a judgment against the appellant, Donnelly, and others, enforcing their liability as stockholders for the debts of the defendant corporation. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made by the trial court, and Donnelly and others appealed to this court from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The order was affirmed, and the case remanded. Commercial v. Azotine, 66 Minn. 413, 69 N. W. 217.
This is an action to sequestrate the property of the defendant corporation under the provisions of G. S. 1894, c. 76. Judgment was so…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commercial Bank v. Azotine Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896