United States v. Josh Christopher Plunkett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Chief Judge WALLACE.
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
Plunkett challenges his- 46-month sentence of imprisonment, which was imposed after he violated the terms and conditions of his probation. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal of the sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm.
I
While serving an unrelated state sentence, Plunkett contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Bureau) and confessed to robbing a bank several years earlier. Bureau officials admitted that without Plunkett’s confession the crime would…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. John William ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. ComitoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald ORTLAND, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Joseph SchwegelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Debbie H. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.