Legal Opinion
Stewart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 22, 1986No. 684-85PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
W.C. DAVIS, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for 25 years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Stewart v. State, 693 S.W.2d 11 (Tex.App.—Hous. [14th] 1985). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address his contention that the evidence is not sufficient to support a conviction for delivery by offer to sell where the substance offered was not a controlled substance.
On February 5, 1982, appellant approached Houston undercover police…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. David RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Clyde J. Pietri and Muncy G. McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- United States v. VickersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Avila v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Limon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.