Legal Opinion

Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. Sylk

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 69-2730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. This controversy arose out of a default in the payment of a note due October 31, 1969, by Collins Wholesale Drug Co., Inc., (hereinafter referred to as “Collins”). Pursuant to an out of court settlement of .a law suit against Collins in New Jersey, the defendant, William Sylk, endorsed and guaranteed the payment of thirteen promissory notes.

On November 1, 1969, the third note became in default, and payment on the balance of the remaining notes, by their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willow Brook Recreation Center, Inc. v. SelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Romano v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. William SylkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Warner-Lambert Pharmaceutical Co. v. SylkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API