Legal Opinion

Haussman v. Kirby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Niehoff, J.

The limited issue on this appeal is whether section 1988 of title 42 of the United States Code authorizes an award to the petitioner of a reasonable attorney’s fee in this case.

The facts are not in dispute.

*245Marie Haussman, the petitioner, a 90-year-old patient at the Patchogue Nursing Center, is a recipient of Medicaid from the Suffolk County Department of Social Services. She was admitted to the nursing center on April 2, 1979, with a diagnosis of cerebral arteriosclerosis and osteoarthritis.

On March 10, 1980, petitioner received a lump-sum check of $2,026.98…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rahmey v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Johnson v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bonilla v. ChardónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  2. Cowan v. Board of Education of the Brentwood Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Central MacHinery Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cleary v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Misuraca v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API