City of Florala v. McLeod
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOTJLDIN, X
This is %. proceeding by mandamus directed to Hon. W. L. Parks, judge of the Twelfth circuit, to require a pending cause transferred to the nonjury docket and heard by the presiding judge without a jury. The cause involved is an appeal from a local assessment on abutting property for municipal 'improvements. Code, § 2204. The petition for mandamus is rested upon two grounds: (1) That no jury is allowed on such appeal; (2) that the right of a jury trial was waived for want of demand according to law.
In City of Huntsville v. Pulley, 187 Ala. 367, 65 So. 405, this court construed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- City of Huntsville v. PulleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Green v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Freeman v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stovall v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Moore v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Arant v. Board of Adjustment of City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Ex Parte Homewood Dairy Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Nolan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.