Legal Opinion

City of Florala v. McLeod

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1927No. 4 Div. 305PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOTJLDIN, X

This is %. proceeding by mandamus directed to Hon. W. L. Parks, judge of the Twelfth circuit, to require a pending cause transferred to the nonjury docket and heard by the presiding judge without a jury. The cause involved is an appeal from a local assessment on abutting property for municipal 'improvements. Code, § 2204. The petition for mandamus is rested upon two grounds: (1) That no jury is allowed on such appeal; (2) that the right of a jury trial was waived for want of demand according to law.

In City of Huntsville v. Pulley, 187 Ala. 367, 65 So. 405, this court construed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. City of Huntsville v. PulleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Green v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Freeman v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stovall v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Moore v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Arant v. Board of Adjustment of City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. Ex Parte Homewood Dairy Products Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Nolan v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API