Legal Opinion
Donaldson v. Macey
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas E. Mercure, J.
This case presents a novel issue on the applicability of the No-Fault Law.
Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 upon the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact and that there is no merit to the cause of action asserted in the complaint herein in that plaintiff has failed to allege “a serious injury”, pursuant to the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law, § 673, subd 1; see, also, CPLR 3016, subd [g]). Plaintiff responds that no such allegation is necessary since the cause does not fall within…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Reisinger v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Reisinger v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Yanis v. Texaco, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Wrenn v. Young Keum ParkNew York Supreme Court · 1993