Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Espinola
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1927No. 1718Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF
PARSONS, J.
The plaintiff’s complaint alleges in part:
“1 That the plaintiff is the rightful owner and seized in fee of a piece or parcel of land situate at Kaapahu, District of Hamakua, County of Hawaii, and being the upper half of Lot No. 33, Map 3 of the Kaapahu Homesteads, and fully described in Land Patent No. 4187, beginning at the upper boundary adjoining Lot No. 34, thence down on the east and west boundaries to certain points which joined together will contain nine and onelialf (9%) acres. And that said points or boundary is marked by the side of the 30 ft. road by a post,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dickson v. YatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Smith v. BarnesMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Knapp v. Tidewater Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.