Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lucero

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1985No. 83CA0397Published

1DissentSternberg, J.

The trial court found that the evidence presented did not prove the existence of a marital relationship between the parties. Looking at the same evidence, the majority concludes that such relationship was demonstrated as a matter of law. In my view, the evidence presents a factual issue, the resolution of which is solely within the province of the trial court. See Linley v. Hanson, 173 Colo. 239, 477 P.2d 453 (1970).

The existence of a common-law marriage in this case is based solely on the testimony of one witness: the putative wife, Rosemary Trujillo. In my view, the majority ignores the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Estate of Klipfel v. KlipfelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. PIONEER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Graham v. GrahamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  5. Ryan v. CordasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API