Fosdick v. Cincinnati (city)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
It seems to us that it would be an unwarranted exercise of power on the part cf a reviewing court to disturb this judgment., A mere difference of opinion, if it existed, would not justify a reversal. In no case is the court authorized to reverse on the ground of the’ weight of the evidence excepting when it is able to say that reasonable minds could not differ. ■ In a case where the issue is one that is not susceptible of exact knowledge and rests wholly in opinion or judgment, there is added reason for having regard for the determination of the jury.
The trial court overruled the…
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Claim of KincadeOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Reibold v. HainesOhio Court of Appeals · 1956