King v. Foerster
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
On appeal from the orphans court of Hudson county. An account was filed in the surrogate’s office by two executors and trustees, and therein one of them (Bollinger) acknowledged that he had received and managed the whole of the trust fund and rendered a specific account of receipts and expenditures, and the other of them (King) disclaimed and denied the receipt by him of any of the trust fund. Exceptions thereto were filed by a cestui que trust.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the orphans court of Hudson county. An account was filed in the surrogate’s office by two executors and trustees, and therein one of them (Bollinger) acknowledged that he had received and managed the whole of the trust fund and rendered a specific account of receipts and expenditures, and the other of them (King) disclaimed and denied the receipt by him of any of the trust fund. Exceptions thereto were filed by a cestui que trust. On the hearing before the orphans court, accountants admitted that all the exceptions except the fourth, fifth and eleventh were well taken, and the…
1Opinion of the Court
The Ordihaky.
By the will of Frederick Foerster, admitted to prohate in Hudson county on May 27th, 1892, all the estate of the testator was given and devised to Jacob Bollinger and Charles King upon certain trusts.
*586In September or October, 1897, an account was filed with the surrogate of Hudson county, which commences as follows:
“The account of Jacob Bollinger and Charles King, executors and trustees, under the last will and testament of Frederick Foerster, deceased, late of the county of Hudson, as well of and' for the estate which has come to their hands, to be administered as for their…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of McCormickBergen County Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Succession of Terriff v. McMahonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1920