Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dailey v. Board of Review, West Virginia Bureau of Employment Programs

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2003No. 30730Published

1DissentDavis, J.

(Filed Nov. 14, 2003)

Under the decision reached by the majority opinion in this case, every employer in the State of West Virginia must provide unemployment compensation benefits to employees who are terminated for obtaining employment through fraudulent misrepresentation and engaging in on-the-job criminal conduct prior to being terminated. I find the majori*429ty opinion to be offensive to every employer and citizen of West Virginia. Therefore, for the reasons provided below, I dissent.1

I

Mr. Dailey Obtained Employment Through Fraudulent Misrepresentation

The majority opinion recognized that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Banker v. BankerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lengyel v. LintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API