State v. Cross
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant stands charged with unlawful possession of a small amount of marijuana 1 and with the unlawful possession of amphetamines. 2 Upon defendant’s pretrial motion, the district court ordered suppressed the seized narcotics found upon a search of defendant’s person incident to his arrest under a warrant for allegedly committing a misdemeanor theft. Since the suppressed evidence is essential to prosecuting defendant for the offense charged, the state, as authorized by Minn. St. 632.11, subd. 1(3), appeals. We reverse.
The sole question raised is whether, upon the facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- State v. AckerleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973