Legal Opinion

Hough v. Hill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Milam. Tried below before the Hon. J. H. Onins. The facts are given in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

Appellants brought this action of trespass to try title against a number of defendants, the land in controversy being 2,866 acres of the Samuel Frost headright league. In an amended petition, the plaintiffs also pray for partition, if defendants or any of them be found to have title to a part of the land. Two of the defendants, in addition to their answer, filed a plea of intervention, asking judgment for the same land against some of their co-defendants; and one of the errors assigned is, allowing this plea and allowing intervenors to take judgment by default against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allison v. KurtzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Bailey v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Rogers v. BrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Robins v. BellasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Faulk v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hill v. ConradTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Connoly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Link v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Connolly v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API