Wentworth v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
We reverse the trial court’s judgment, which was based on its finding that Wentworth failed to exercise "due diligence” in locating a known but missing tortfeasor. The request for service by publication pursuant to Code - § 56-407.1 (d) and (e) should have been granted. For this reason, summary judgment in favor of Fireman’s Fund, Wentworth’s uninsured motorist carrier, should not have been granted; moreover, Fireman’s Fund’s correct remedy was not a summary judgment, as its motion raised a matter in abatement.
I
Under Code § 56-407.1 (e), a motorist or vehicle owner against whom a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ogden Equipment Co. v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Norman v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Highland Ditch Co. v. MumfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Smith v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. BoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Bailey v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.