Legal Opinion

People v. Walton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1990No. 4-89-0875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Defendant, Anthony Walton, was found guilty of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 19—1(a)) after a jury trial and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the trial court should have suppressed his confession, and (2) the prosecutor’s closing argument denied him a fair trial.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress defendant’s confession, police officer Jeff Bond testified that he gave defendant the Miranda warnings. Specifically, Bond stated the following:

“[Defense Counsel] Q. You recall how you gave him those Miranda warnings?

A. I just gave him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. People v. HerrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. The People v. DenhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Holder v. CaseltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. People v. CamdenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. People v. FickettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. People v. RushAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API