Legal Opinion

Saljanin v. Vuksanaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover on a promissory note, the defendants Vuksan Vuksanaj and VKV Associates appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered March 21, 2000, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $50,000.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $50,000 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $45,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*526Contrary to the appellants’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Bank v. . BarnabyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Roth v. MichelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Park Associates v. Crescent Park Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Scionti v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCoy Associates, Inc. v. Nulux, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  2. Pomaro v. Quality Sheet Metal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Wilmington – 5190 Brandywine Parkway, LLC v. Acadia Brandywine Holdings LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API