Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Appleby

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 7, 1849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This was an action of trespass on the case. The declaration set forth that, in the month of March, 1847, the defendants applied to the plaintiffs to purchase from them a quantity of tobacco, and offered in payment a promissory note of Barstow Emanuel, & Co., dated New York, January 15, 1847, for the sum of $274 80, payable in six months; that the defendants represented the note to be good, and the makers in good credit, and that the plaintiffs relying upon the…

Read the full summary

This was an action of trespass on the case. The declaration set forth that, in the month of March, 1847, the defendants applied to the plaintiffs to purchase from them a quantity of tobacco, and offered in payment a promissory note of Barstow Emanuel, & Co., dated New York, January 15, 1847, for the sum of $274 80, payable in six months; that the defendants represented the note to be good, and the makers in good credit, and that the plaintiffs relying upon the representations so made, sold and delivered to the defendants a quantity of tobacco, and took the note in payment. In the second count…

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Sandford, J.

The evidence suffices to establish, that the plaintiffs were induced to take Emanuel’s note in exchange for their tobacco, by Appleby’s representation that the note was good; when in fact it was not good, and Appleby knew it.

The declaration states this representation substantially as it was proved. Saying that there were people in South street who would take the note, is not essentially variant from saying that it would pass in South street.

The other alleged variance depends upon the principal question in the cause, the liability of Moore in respect of the fraud of his partner Appleby.

It has…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roth v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hooley v. GieveNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
  3. Chester v. DickersonNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Stockwell v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1870
  5. French & Davies v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API