Legal Opinion
Markowitz & Co. v. Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 23, 1977No. Civ. No. C 70-268PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON J. YOUNG, District Judge:
This cause is before the Court upon motion of defendants for a stay of execution of judgment without bond pending appeal. The Toledo Metropolitan Housing Authority (hereafter TMHA) is a public housing authority created pursuant to Ohio statutes. This action was brought within the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. TMHA contends that it would be exempt from posting a supersedeas bond had this litigation occurred in state court; that the supersedeas bond exemption is a state rule of substance; and that the Court must grant the stay without requiring bond under the rule…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Miller v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Joseph Skillken & Co. v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association, William S. Apple Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Boggs v. Blue Diamond Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1980
- Wilmer v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS, LEAVENWORTHDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Lamon v. City of Shawnee, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.