Standard Implement Co. v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Barber District Qou/rt. ■ This was a replevin action, brought on the 17th day of April, 1889, by The Standard Implement Company against GeorgeW. Stevens, as sheriff, for the recovery of $1,800 worth of personal property, consisting of agricultural implements, buggies, etc., obtained by L. M. Spencer from the Standard Implement Company.
Read the full summary
Error from Barber District Qou/rt. ■ This was a replevin action, brought on the 17th day of April, 1889, by The Standard Implement Company against GeorgeW. Stevens, as sheriff, for the recovery of $1,800 worth of personal property, consisting of agricultural implements, buggies, etc., obtained by L. M. Spencer from the Standard Implement Company. George W. Stevens, the sheriff, filed an answer alleging that he held the personal property under two orders of attachment, pending in the district court of. Barber county, in favor of the Parlin & Orendorff Company against L. M. Spencer. The Parlin…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
This action was disposed of in the trial court upon the ground that judgments involving the same property had recently been rendered in two prior actions against the Standard Implement Company and in favor of the Parlin & Orendorff Company in the district court of Barber county. It appears from the record that, prior to the trial of this action, both of these cases were taken by the Standard Implement Company, upon proceedings in error, for review to this court, and were pending in this court at the time of the trial. In each of those…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Custody of RectorColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- City of Topeka v. Pleasant SmelserCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897