Legal Opinion

VASILIOS PENTSAS v. CHAD MURRAY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00128Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VASILIOS PENTSAS, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-128 ) Judge Stephanie L. Haines CHAD MURRAY, ) Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM ORDER Presently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31) filed by defendant Chad Murray (“Mr. Murray” or “Defendant”), Also before the Court is Vasilios Pentsas’ (“Mr. Pentsas” or “Plaintiff’) Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 38). Plaintiff's remaining claim in this lawsuit concerns a failure to protect claim pursuant to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. City of Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  4. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API