Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Graves

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1986No. 8617SC124Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict and his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. He argues that all the evidence shows the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. If all the evidence so clearly established the contributory negligence of the plaintiff as one of the proximate causes of the injury, that no other reasonable conclusion is possible, it was error not to allow the defendant’s motion for directed verdict and his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. See Ragland v. Moore, 299 N.C.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ragland v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Tyndall Ex Rel. Tyndall v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Meadows v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Hughes v. GraggCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API