Legal Opinion

People v. Shadden

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2001No. B147302PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*167Opinion

GILBERT (P. J.),

Here we conclude that the movement of a victim nine feet is sufficient to support a conviction for kidnapping to commit rape.

Reno Keith Shadden appeals a judgment after conviction of kidnapping to commit rape (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)),1 assault with intent to commit rape (§ 220), false imprisonment (§ 236), burglary (§ 459), and second degree robbery (§ 211). The court sentenced him to life with the possibility of parole, plus three years. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the conviction for both robbery and kidnapping to commit rape. We reverse the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. RayfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. HoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. People v. JandresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API