Hodges v. Ninth National Bank
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First and Second Exceptions waived.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. First and Second Exceptions waived. Third Exception.—The plaintiffs offered the two following prayers: 1. That if the jury believe from the evidence, that the plaintiffs sold to the house of James Duncan & Company, the goods mentioned in the account filed with the attachment papers, at the prices therein set forth, and that said account, or any part thereof, was due on the 19th of February, 1816, when the attachment was issued; and shall further find that the firm of George Hughes & Company, of…
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
It appears from the record that Hodges Brothers issued an attachment against George Hughes, Thomas A. Smith, John Waddell and John Caldwell, partners, trading as James Duncan and Company, and caused the same to be levied upon certain goods in the City of Baltimore. The appellee filed a petition claiming the property, and filed pleas, and also issued an attachment and caused it also to be levied upon the same goods, this second attachment being against George Hughes and Thomas A. Smith, trading as James Duncan and Company. Judgment was rendered in favor of the claimant, and from that judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maltby v. the Northwestern Virginia Rail Road Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Doremus v. McCormickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Cadwallader v. KroesenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
3Cited by1 opinion
- Filter v. Meyer SchroederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897