Legal Opinion
Aetna Insurance v. Fowler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1896PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Saginaw; Wilber,'J. Assumpsit by the Aetna Insurance Company against Charles G. Fowler, Chester Brown, and Gustavus H. Fuerbringer upon an indemnity bond. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants Brown and Fuerbringer bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Action on the bond of an insurance agent. Defendant Fowler was employed as the agent of the company at Saginaw, and in December, 1883, executed a bond, with his codefendants as sureties, the conditions being as follows:
“The condition of this obligation is such that whereas the above-named Charles G. Fowler has been appointed agent of the Aetna Insurance Company in Saginaw, Saginaw county, State of Michigan, who will receive as such agent sums of money for premiums, payments of losses, salvages, collections, or otherwise, for goods, chattels, or other property of the said insurance company,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watertown Fire Insurance v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alfalfa Electric Coop., Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Andrews v. Minter Coal & Coke Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Mason & Hamlin Co. v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Fuel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.