Legal Opinion

Cogswell Hall, Inc. v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1987No. 86-756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before us is whether the property in question “is used exclusively for charitable purposes” pursuant to R.C. 5709.12, so as to be exempt from taxation.1

The case controlling here is Philada Home Fund v. Bd. of Tax Appeals (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d 135, 34 O.O. 2d 262, 214 N.E. 2d 431, the syllabus of which is as follows:

“Real property owned by a nonprofit charitable corporation the stated purpose of which is to secure and operate resident apartments for aged and needy persons is not exempt from taxation under Section 5709.12, Revised Code, even though it is shown that the rent intended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philada Home Fund v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  2. National Church Residences of Chillicothe v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. NBC-USA Hous., Inc. — Five v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. NBC-USA Hous., Inc. — Five v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API