Moody v. Munich
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion
WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA JOE MOODY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) HANS MUNICH, et al., ) ) No. 1:23-cv-0006-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R Motion to Remand Plaintiffs Joe Moody, Mark Pellett, and Barbara Sylvester-Pellett move to remand this matter to state court.1 This motion is opposed by defendants Hans Munich, Tanya Hutchins, and Coastal Air Service LLC.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary. Background Plaintiffs allege that Munich and Hutchins are the owners/operators of “a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.