Legal Opinion

Upchurch v. Hudson Funeral Home, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1965No. 676PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, J.

Defendants assign errors which, they contend, entitle them to a new trial.

— I —

The City of Durham Traffic Code, pertaining to automatic traffic lights, and an amendment thereto, Ordinance No. 1134, were pleaded by plaintiffs and admitted in evidence. It was stipulated by the parties that the code, as amended by said ordinance, had been duly adopted. The pertinent portion of Ordinance No. 1134 provides as follows:

“Whenever traffic is controlled by traffic control signals, placed in accordance with the traffic ordinances of the City of Durham, exhibiting the word ‘Go,’ ‘Caution’, or ‘Stop’, or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Bell v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. . OwnbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Sara Lee Corp. v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Kanoy v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. BrinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API