Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1983No. 510-81PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, C.J.

This case arose out of plaintiffs’ breach of contract action in connection with the proposed sale of defendants’ farm. By their complaint plaintiffs sought compensatory damages on a theory of quantum meruit for the fair market value of labor, materials and equipment provided in anticipation of the proposed sale, and for punitive damages based on defendants’ false and fraudulent misrepresentations to plaintiffs throughout the transactions.

After jury trial, plaintiffs recovered their compensatory damages on the quantum meruit count, as well as punitive damages on their claim of fraudulent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Shortle v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  3. Parker v. HoeferSupreme Court of Vermont · 1953
  4. Evarts v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. Pezzano v. BonneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Crump v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  4. Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Bruntaeger v. ZellerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API