Legal Opinion

Village of Chagrin Falls v. Katelanos

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1988No. 54282PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

Apparently pursuant to a plea bargain, the defendant, Peter Katelanos, pled no contest to driving with an excessive blood-alcohol content, and the prosecution dismissed charges of driving while intoxicated and driving left of center. The defendant appeals from the resulting conviction. His six assignments of error, set forth in an Appendix to this opinion, argue that the court (a) failed to inform him of the effect of his plea before accepting it, and (b) failed to obtain an explanation of the circumstances of the offense before finding him guilty.

We agree that the proceedings were defective,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. City of Cleveland v. WhipkeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. GilboOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. SchornakOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Berea v. MoorerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API