Legal Opinion

H & R Roofing of South Dakota, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] The South Dakota Department of Revenue (DOR) appeals the circuit court decision reversing DOR’s assessment of municipal use taxes against H & R. We reverse.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] H & R is a roofing contractor. It receives and stores bulk quantities of roofing materials in its rural Lincoln County warehouse. H & R pays the South Dakota state sales tax due and owing on the materials at the time they are delivered to its warehouse, but, as the warehouse is not located in a municipal taxing jurisdiction, no municipal use tax is due at that time. H & R sends these materials to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. South Dakota State Board of DentistrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. National Food Corp. v. Aurora County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Northwestern National Bank of Sioux Falls v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Nickerson v. American States InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graceland College Center for Professional Development & Lifelong Learning, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API