Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Tierney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 25, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The substance of the allegations of the complaint is that the plaintiff, at the request of the defendant, advanced to him $60,000, which the defendant represented was necessary to retain attorneys to represent the proponents of the will of the plaintiff's wife (in which the plaintiff, the defendant and another were named as executors) in-a contest .over the admission of the will to probate, but that all counsel representing the executors and guardians ad litem were paid in full from the estate, and the defendant refuses to return or account for the money so advanced by the plaintiff. Aside…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferrie v. SperrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. State v. StockfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Levine v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Sottosanto v. LucasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Kendall v. LutherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. LafontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Talbot v. Waterbury Hospital CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API