Legal Opinion

Cushenberry v. McMurray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Crawford District Court. Replevin, brought by Cushenberry against McMurray. Trial at the April Term, 1881, of the district court, and judgment for defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of replevin, brought by plaintiff in error (plaintiff below) against the defendant, who was sheriff of Crawford county, to recover possession of a stock of goods held by him under an execution against the husband of plaintiff. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a general verdict for the defendant.

*330x properly™™' fusea. *329Only two questions are presented by counsel for our consideration. When the case was called for trial, counsel for plaintiff presented an affidavit for a continuance, made by the husband of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quincy Whig Co. v. TillsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Wick v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Hall v. Florida State Drainage Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. TontzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API